“We have lost everything.” The Afghan refugees in America are a “lost” homeland and their dreams are threatened

“We lost everything” policy… Afghan refugees in America are a “lost” homeland and threatened dreams Updated Saturday 12/31/2022 12:40 PM Abu Dhabi time “We lost everything in Afghanistan after the return of the Taliban to power, and now we do not know our future here.” A state of uncertainty is facing the Afghan refugees in America, with the faltering legalization of their status. This state of uncertainty made Afghan refugees unable to integrate with the new society, in which they settled after the Taliban took control of power in Afghanistan, in August 2021. And the “Voice of America” website says that tens of thousands of refugees who fled from The Taliban’s control over two years ago now lives in the United States in limbo, with Congress so far failing to find a way to legalize the residency of the Afghans who worked alongside American soldiers in America’s longest war. UncertaintyAccording to the American site, some lawmakers had hoped to resolve the status of Afghan immigrants as part of the government funding package for the end of the year, but those efforts failed, while the issue entered the new year, in which the Republicans will take power in the House of Representatives, which makes there a state of uncertainty certainty for refugees. After the “messy” US withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, the nearly 76,000 Afghans who had worked with US soldiers since 2001 as translators, interpreters, and partners arrived in the US on military planes, promising a better course to life in America for their service. Among the Afghans awaiting resolution is Mohammad Behzad Haqq, 30, who is unable to work or settle in his new community of Fairfax, Virginia, under his parole status. “We lost everything in Afghanistan after the Taliban came back to power,” says Mohammed, who served as a partner in the US mission in Afghanistan as a human rights advocate for the now defunct Afghan government. “Now, we don’t know our future here.” Controversial law Over the past year, a bipartisan group of lawmakers, backed by veterans’ organizations and former military officials, pushed Congress to pass the Afghan Adjustment Act, which would prevent Afghans from becoming stuck without legal residency status when their parole period ends. For two years, in August 2023. The law, if passed, should enable eligible Afghans to apply for US citizenship, as has been the case for refugees in the past, including from Cuba, Vietnam and Iraq. Proponents of the proposal say their efforts have been thwarted by one man, Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which oversees immigration issues. Security Council condemns Taliban ban on Afghan women: It undermines human rights “We’ve never seen support for legislation like this and its failure to pass,” said Sean Van Diver, a Navy veteran and president of “AfghanEvac,” a coalition that supports Afghan resettlement efforts. To me one person from Iowa can stop this.” Grassley has argued for months that the bill goes too far by including evacuees other than those “who have been our partners for the past 20 years”, providing a path to residency without the proper vetting required. “First and foremost, the people who are helping our country have to have the promise we made to them,” Grassley told the Associated Press. “There is some disagreement about the vetting process. That was an issue that hasn’t been resolved yet.” Letter to Congress Legislators dismiss these concerns; More than 30 retired military officers, including three former chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in a letter to Congress that the bill “not only advances the national security interests of the United States, but also represents a moral imperative,” calling on the White House to pass it. Biden’s press secretary, Karen Jean-Pierre, said in mid-December: “It’s important to take care of the Afghan allies who take care of us.” The proposal, if approved, will provide a simplified and prioritized adjustment process for Afghan citizens who have supported the US mission in Afghanistan, while the Department of Homeland Security will adjust the status of qualified evacuees to grant them legal permanent residence status after they undergo strict screening and screening procedures, according to Voice of America. , who noted that the law would improve and expand protections for those left behind and at risk in Afghanistan. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, recently told reporters, “The Afghan refugees are a top priority and they have some good Republican support, but unfortunately the Republican leadership has blocked them. These are the people who risked their lives for our soldiers and our country.” We must reward them as we have done in the past.” Several congressional aides explained the reasons for the bill’s suspension by pointing to a seven-page, single-spaced letter obtained by the Associated Press and distributed by Grassley’s office to all 50 Republican senators last August. U.S. military and national security officials outlined the rigorous screening process that the evacuees went through before arriving on U.S. soil, and those security checks, conducted in Europe and the Middle East, included background checks of applicants, with personal information and biometric checks using voice prints. And iris scans, palm prints, and facial photos. But Republicans say the screening system is not secure, pointing to a September report from the Inspector General for Homeland Security that said at least two people from Afghanistan released in the country “pose a risk to the national security and safety of local communities.” As a result, mandatory in-person interviews for all Afghan applicants were written into the bill along with requirements that relevant agencies brief Congress on proposed screening procedures before they are put into effect. Despite bolstering the scrutiny over months of negotiations, the bill never made it out of Judiciary Committee and failed to win inclusion in the just-passed $1.7 trillion government funding bill. Confused Questions Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar, who was one of the main sponsors of the bill, said: “If this is what we do when they come into our country, and we don’t support them, then what message are we sending to the rest of the world who stand with our soldiers, who protect them, who provide security for their families ? But Klobuchar and the main Republican sponsor, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, pledged to return the bill again in the new session of Congress, which will be held next January. “It’s the right thing to do,” Graham, an Air Force veteran, told the Senate recently. “There’s no other end to which I could agree,” adding, “The people who were with us in combat, who are here in America, They need to stay. This will be their new home.”

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button